Foreign Award Unenforceable, If Arbitration Agreement Unsigned

Wednesday December 14, 2016. BY Arundhati Sukhtankar | Arbitration and Conciliation

The Delhi High Court in a recent judgement refused the enforcement of the foreign award under section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1966 (“the Act”) as one party to the contract had not

Eitzen Bulk A/S v. Ashapurna Minechem Ltd. & Anr. : Choosing juridical seat of arbitration attracts law applicable to chosen location

Thursday May 19, 2016. BY Gayatri Mohapatra & Arjun Sathees | Arbitration and Conciliation

In a recent judgement passed by the Supreme Court in Eitzen Bulk A/S v. Ashapurna Minechem Ltd. & Anr.,[1], Justices S. A. Bobde and Fakhir Mohammed Ibrahim Kalifulla, deliberated on the question of applicability of

Union of India v. M/s Ambica Construction

Wednesday March 30, 2016. BY Nivedita Iyengar | Arbitration and Conciliation

Brief Facts of the Case In the case of Union of India v. M/s Ambica Construction[1], the Appellant had executed an agreement with the Respondent for fabrication of tie bars from M.S. Flats in CST-9

Arbitral award amount is inclusive of pre-award interest

Friday December 12, 2014. BY | Arbitration and Conciliation

By J.Mandakini In a recent case,[1] the Supreme Court of India discussed the concepts of imposing pre-award and post-award interest on the arbitral award amount under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“The Act”). Facts

Transmission of arbitral award not required for execution, Karnataka HC clarifies the position

Wednesday September 24, 2014. BY | Arbitration and Conciliation

By Srinivas Atreya Chatti The Karnataka High Court has, in a recent order dismissing a Writ Petition (Chandrashekhar v. Tata Motor Finance Ltd & Others)[1], clarified that for the purpose of executing an arbitral award

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10