Insights

NN Global Mercantile Limited v. Indo Unique Flame Limited and Ors. – The Minority View
May 5, 2023

NN Global Mercantile Limited v. Indo Unique Flame Limited and Ors. – The Minority View →

Supreme Court allows retrospective application of the amended S.29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
April 4, 2023

Supreme Court allows retrospective application of the amended S.29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 →

quantum of interest in a contract
March 27, 2023

In absence of an explicit clause on quantum of interest in a contract, compound interest cannot be awarded: Delhi High Court →

Assignee can invoke arbitration clause Bombay High Court
March 9, 2023

Assignee, having stepped into the shoes of the assignor, can invoke arbitration clause: Bombay High Court. →

Arbitrators fees Under The Fourth Schedule Of A and C Act
March 1, 2023

Supreme Court Clarifies The Law On Payment Of Fees To Arbitrators →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
February 8, 2023

Delhi High Court reiterates its findings on what constitutes non est filing for the purposes of calculating period of limitation. →

Bombay High Court
February 1, 2023

Once the reference under MSMED Act is filed, it would override invocation of arbitration by other party: Bombay High court →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
January 18, 2023

DISPUTES REGARDING NON-PAYMENT OF DUES CANNOT BE REFERRED TO ARBITRATION AS IT IS SIMPLY A CASE OF RECOVERY: PUNJAB AND HARYANA HC →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
January 4, 2023

HC: Section 47 of CPC Cannot Be Applicable While Executing Arbitral Awards States Tripura High Court →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
December 14, 2022

Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would apply to International Commercial Arbitration, where the place of Arbitration is outside India: States Calcutta High Court →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
December 7, 2022

PENDENCY OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SARFAESI ACT DOES NOT BAR INITIATION OF ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS STATES DELHI HC →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
November 23, 2022

THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN THE WORK ORDERS/CONSULTING AGREEMENTS WOULD NOT BE BINDING IF MOU, BEING BASE OF THE CLAIM DOES NOT INCLUDE AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE: STATES PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT →