Delhi High Court reiterates its findings on what constitutes non est filing for the purposes of calculating period of limitation.

Wednesday February 8, 2023. BY Aaushi Doshi and Neeli Sandesara | Arbitration and Conciliation

Introduction The High Court of Delhi, in a recent judgement re-iterated the concept of non-est filing in Ambrosia Corner House Private Limited V. Hangro S Foods1. The Court laid out instances that would constitute non-est

Bombay High Court

Once the reference under MSMED Act is filed, it would override invocation of arbitration by other party: Bombay High court

Wednesday February 1, 2023. BY Nidhi Singh (Associate Partner) & Chitrang Gamoth (Associate) | Arbitration and Conciliation

The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in a recent order passed on 24th January 2023 has ruled that the ongoing dispute filed under the provision of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSMED Act,

DISPUTES REGARDING NON-PAYMENT OF DUES CANNOT BE REFERRED TO ARBITRATION AS IT IS SIMPLY A CASE OF RECOVERY: PUNJAB AND HARYANA HC

Wednesday January 18, 2023. BY Aaushi Doshi | Arbitration and Conciliation

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in a recent judgment1 held that when the dispute between the parties relates to a case of simpliciter non-payment of dues it cannot be said to

HC: Section 47 of CPC Cannot Be Applicable While Executing Arbitral Awards States Tripura High Court

Wednesday January 4, 2023. BY Civil Team | Arbitration and Conciliation

The Hon’ble High Court of Tripura in its recent judgment1 passed on December 2022 held that Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) is not applicable to the execution of an arbitration

Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would apply to International Commercial Arbitration, where the place of Arbitration is outside India: States Calcutta High Court

Wednesday December 14, 2022. BY Aaushi Doshi | Arbitration and Conciliation

In a recent judgment1, the Calcutta High Court held that even if the parties select the arbitration to be foreign seated, the intelligible comprehension cannot be that expressly or impliedly, merely by such selection, powers

PENDENCY OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SARFAESI ACT DOES NOT BAR INITIATION OF ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS STATES DELHI HC

Wednesday December 7, 2022. BY Aaushi Doshi | Arbitration and Conciliation

In a recent judgment1 the High Court of Delhi, in a Section 11 Petition, held that the initiation of the arbitration proceedings cannot be barred merely because the Petitioner has taken steps for recovery/possession of

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10