data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22b8b/22b8bd77113dea02fc0dc4acc6923d33e13e85f6" alt=""
ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL CAN NOT ORDER INTERIM DEPOSIT OF DISPUTED AMOUNT, WHERE THE LIABILITY IS IN DISPUTE: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna held, in a recent judgment1 Arbitral Tribunal (“Tribunal”) cannot pass an interim order under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7522c/7522c2b1f5f7d328b6da6181710497b995b86126" alt=""
ARBITRAL AWARD IS NULL AND VOID IF PASSED PAST THE PRESCRIBED PERIOD: TELANGANA HC
The Telangana High Court comprising Justice P. Naveen Rao and Dr. Justice G. Radha Rani, in a recent Judgement1 held that the provisions of Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the “Act”),
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67050/6705027bf98c002d201d00f16350d8e1a34e881c" alt="Arbitration"
Indian parties can choose a foreign seat of arbitration
The Supreme Court in PASL Wind Solutions Private Limited vs. GE Power Conversion India Private Limited[1] has ruled that two companies incorporated in India can choose a forum for arbitration outside India. It also ruled
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e673/2e6739c2e80afe1c6a489cf90ee003b96d762a02" alt="Article 137 of Limitation Act"
Limitation period for filing application under Section 11 of Arbitration Act governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act
The Supreme Court in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & another vs. M/s Nortel Networks Pvt. Ltd.[1] has held that the period of limitation for filing an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e673/2e6739c2e80afe1c6a489cf90ee003b96d762a02" alt="Article 137 of Limitation Act"
Admissibility of Arbitration Clause in Insufficient Stamped Agreement
A three bench judge of the Supreme Court comprising of CJI S.A. Bobde, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Surya Kant in a recent judgment M/s Dharmaratnakara Rai Bahadur Arcot Narainswamy Mudaliar Chattram & Other Charities
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e673/2e6739c2e80afe1c6a489cf90ee003b96d762a02" alt="Article 137 of Limitation Act"
ARBITRATION SEAT COURT HAS JURISDICTION TO EXECUTE ARBITRATION AWARD
The Bombay High Court in a recent judgment considered whether a Court[1], within whose jurisdiction arbitration takes place, which also has supervisory jurisdiction over arbitration (“Arbitral Court”), can entertain application for execution of arbitral award,
- Arbitration and Conciliation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy Code – Public Announcements
- Civil
- Commercial litigation
- Commercial/Corporate
- Competition act
- Criminal
- Cyber Law
- Debt Recovery
- Environment
- Family Law
- Food
- IL News
- Infrastructure
- Insolvency & Bankruptcy
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International
- Labour
- Law
- Medico-Legal
- Negotiable Instrument
- NRI Laws
- Policy
- Power
- Real Estate
- Tax