Delhi High Court Holds Employment Lock-In Period Clauses As Enforceable, And Disputes On These As Arbitrable

Delhi High Court Holds Employment Lock-In Period Clauses As Enforceable, And Disputes On These As Arbitrable

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court (“HC”) recently ruled that a reasonable lock-in period in an employment contract is lawful and thereby, does not infringe upon fundamental rights. The HC clarified that disputes arising from such

Code Of Civil Procedure 1908 Application Under Order Vii Rule 11 Cannot Be Rejected On The Ground That Written Statements Is Not Filed.

Code Of Civil Procedure 1908 | Application Under Order Vii Rule 11 Cannot Be Rejected On The Ground That Written Statements Is Not Filed

The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court (“HC”) on 24th June 2024, passed an order[1] pronouncing that, “The filing of a written statement is not a condition precedent for considering an application under Order VIII Rule 11

Latest Development On Circulars For Lookout, Wilful Defaulters And Fraud

Download PPT

Maharashtra Stamp Act Refund of Stamp Duty Cannots Be Denied on Mere Technical Grounds

Maharashtra Stamp Act | Refund of Stamp Duty Cannot Be Denied on Mere Technical Grounds

The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”), in a recent decision[i], upheld and relayed an observation made in its earlier decision of Committee-GFIL v. Libra Buildtech Private Limited & Ors.[ii], wherein the Hon’ble SC observed that: “19.

Bombay High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Employees Cannot Subsequently Challenge Their Promotion After Accepting The Same Without Demur

In a recent judgment, passed in the matter of Shri Shripad Dwarkanath Gupte and Ors. v. Union of India[1] the Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“HC”) elucidated that employees who have accepted promotions based on grades,

Upholding Plaints Seeking Urgent Relief Without Pre-Institution Mediation Barriers

Upholding Plaints Seeking Urgent Relief Without Pre-Institution Mediation Barriers

In a recent judgement[i], the Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“HC”), dismissed an application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (“CPC”), by Chemco Plast (“Defendant”) seeking rejection of a trademark

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16