Procedural pitfalls: An Analysis of improper Summons service in M/S Trois Corporation HK Ltd v. M/s National Ventures Pvt Limited

Procedural pitfalls: An Analysis of improper Summons service in M/S Trois Corporation HK Ltd v. M/s National Ventures Pvt Limited

Abstract: In the case of M/s Trois Corporation HK Ltd v. M/s National Ventures Private Limited, the Hon’ble Supreme Court grappled with the intricacies of procedural fairness and adherence to legal requirements in civil litigation.

Central Consumer Protection Authority Releases Draft Greenwashing Guidelines

Central Consumer Protection Authority Releases Draft Greenwashing Guidelines

The Central Consumer Protection Authority has released draft Guidelines aiming to prevent Greenwashing. The draft Guidelines proposes to impose penalty as per the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 on companies and service providers who indulge in

If the Document Required to be Stamped is Insufficiently Stamped, then its Copy Cannot be Adduced as Secondary Evidence: Supreme Court

If the Document Required to be Stamped is Insufficiently Stamped, then its Copy Cannot be Adduced as Secondary Evidence: Supreme Court

The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) recently in the case of Vijay v. Union of India[1], held that if a document required to be stamped is not sufficiently stamped, then a copy of such a document

Parties Entitled to Final Arguments even in the absence of Written Statement: Supreme Court

Parties Entitled to Final Arguments even in the absence of Written Statement: Supreme Court 

In a remarkable judgement, the Division Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court comprising of Justice B. V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, has set aside the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (“NCDRC”), for

Airlines shall be held liable for default in the services promised by its Agent: Supreme Court

Airlines shall be held liable for default in the services promised by its Agent: Supreme Court

The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) in a recent notable judgment held that the Airlines shall be bound by the time schedule promised by its agent.   In the instant case the Appellant, Rajasthan Art Emporium booked

Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 will be applicable only when a defence is raised under Section 30(2)(e) of the Act, followed by a plea of the invalidity of mark: Delhi High Court

The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi[1] (“HC”) recently dismissed an application moved by International Great Brands LLC, under section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“TM Act”) against Parle’s ‘FABIO’ mark.The HC dismissed the

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9