Non-disclosure of material facts: a good ground for insurance company to repudiate claims

By Balram Patwa Introduction Insurance is nothing but a promise or assurance on the part of the insurer to pay an insured’s claim to the insured in return of receipt of the premium amount paid

KSL & Industries Ltd. vs. M/s. Arihant Trades Ltd. & Ors.

The verdict of Supreme Court in KSL Industries Ltd. Vs. M/s. Arihant Trade Ltd. & Ors., delivered on 27th October,2014, held that provisions of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (“SICA”) shall prevail over

Bombay HC ruling in favour of Vodafone in transfer pricing case

By Saurav Agarwal The judgment of a division bench, headed by Chief Justice Mohit Shah and Justice M Sanklecha, of the Bombay High Court on October 10, 2014 in Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd. v.

Transmission of arbitral award not required for execution, Karnataka HC clarifies the position

By Srinivas Atreya Chatti The Karnataka High Court has, in a recent order dismissing a Writ Petition (Chandrashekhar v. Tata Motor Finance Ltd & Others)[1], clarified that for the purpose of executing an arbitral award

CCI rejects plea to repeal IRDA (Licensing of Bancassurance Agents) Regulations, 2012

By Balram Patwa In Re Dilip Modwil v. IRDA [Decided on 12 September, 2014] Brief of the case Dilip Modwil (the “Informant”) approached the Competition Commission of India (“Commission”) through an application u/s 19(1)(a) of

Vijay Kumar Shailendra vs. The Delhi HC Legal Service Committee : Jurisdiction of cheque dishonour cases

By Shuchi Mehta The Supreme Court has given one more judgment indicating that courts should take the jurisdiction in cheque dishonor cases only if the bank that dishonored the cheque is situated within its jurisdiction.

1 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115