While the Income Tax Department enjoys a limited jurisdiction to continue assessment proceedings, it cannot suo moto initiate recovery for tax dues – during liquidation process – NCLAT, New Delhi

Avil Menezes, Liquidator of Sunil Hitech and Engineers Limited Vs. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai Introduction:- In the case of Avil Menezes (Liquidator) v. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai[1], The Hon’ble

Can a delay caused by a stay granted by a Higher Court in implementation of a Resolution Plan be excluded from the time given for the implementation of the Resolution Plan

Can a delay caused by a stay granted by a Higher Court in implementation of a Resolution Plan be excluded from the time given for the implementation of the Resolution Plan?

Introduction: In the matter of Majestic Auto Limited v. Sharan Hospitality Pvt Ltd. & Anr.[i], the Hon’ble NCLAT held that when a Higher Court grants a stay order which puts an embargo on implementation of

Delhi High Court Holds Employment Lock-In Period Clauses As Enforceable, And Disputes On These As Arbitrable

Delhi High Court Holds Employment Lock-In Period Clauses As Enforceable, And Disputes On These As Arbitrable

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court (“HC”) recently ruled that a reasonable lock-in period in an employment contract is lawful and thereby, does not infringe upon fundamental rights. The HC clarified that disputes arising from such

Our Senior Partner Shiju PV Quoted in Business Standard

In a recent article published by Business Standard titled “New asset class to foster innovation, raise competition, say experts”, Our Senior Partner Shiju Pv shares his expert insights. Shiju Opined “It is a good opportunity

RBI Issues Revised Master Directions on Fraud

RBI Issues Revised Master Directions On Fraud

The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) in State Bank of India & Ors. v. Rajesh Agarwal & Ors.[i] had clarified that principles of natural justice must be upheld while declaring any individual / entity as fraud.

Code Of Civil Procedure 1908 Application Under Order Vii Rule 11 Cannot Be Rejected On The Ground That Written Statements Is Not Filed.

Code Of Civil Procedure 1908 | Application Under Order Vii Rule 11 Cannot Be Rejected On The Ground That Written Statements Is Not Filed

The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court (“HC”) on 24th June 2024, passed an order[1] pronouncing that, “The filing of a written statement is not a condition precedent for considering an application under Order VIII Rule 11

1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 97