Landowners And Builder Jointly Liable Despite Revocation Of Power Of Attorney Supreme Court

Landowners And Builder Jointly Liable Despite Revocation Of Power Of Attorney: Supreme Court

The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) in the case of Akshay and Anr. v. Aditya and Ors.[i] dismissed the Civil Appeals filed in a real estate dispute. The bench comprising of Bela M. Trivedi and Satish

Our Associate Partner Aaushi Shah Doshi quoted in inc42 Media

In a recent article published by Inc42 Media titled “Inside The Messy Split Between Anupam Mittal’s Shaadi.com And WestBridge”, Our Associate Partner Aaushi Shah Doshi shares her expert insights. Aaushi Opined ” Singapore law is

Appellate Courts Must Adhere To Order XLI And Cannot Create A New Case For Parties Supreme Court

Appellate Courts Must Adhere To Order XLI And Cannot Create A New Case For Parties: Supreme Court

In a recent landmark judgment[i], the Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) emphasized a crucial principle in appellate jurisprudence, stating that the appellate courts must strictly adhere to procedural norms and cannot create new issues or cases

Property Owner Liable To Pay Water Tax Levied By Local Corporation Irrespective Of Usage

Property Owner Liable To Pay Water Tax Levied By Local Corporation Irrespective Of Usage

In a pivotal ruling, the Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“HC”) held that property owners must pay water tax and water benefit tax even if the water facility is not utilized by either the owner or

Delhi High Court Upholds Its Original Side Rules, Prescribing A Maximum Period Of 120 Days For Filing Of Written Statements In All Suits Filed Before It

Delhi High Court Upholds Its Original Side Rules, Prescribing A Maximum Period Of 120 Days For Filing Of Written Statements In All Suits Filed Before It

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court (“Delhi HC”) was recently presented with a challenge[i] to the constitutionality of Rule 4, Chapter VII of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 (“Original Side Rules”)[ii], which mandates

Whether the restructuring process as contemplated in the Notification dated 29th May 2015 issued by the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) is directory or mandatory.

Whether the restructuring process as contemplated in the Notification dated 29th May 2015 issued by the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) is directory or mandatory.

Introduction The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in a recent landmark decision passed vide Order dated 01.08.2024 in the matter of Pro Knits v. Board of Directors of Canara Bank[i], addressed a crucial issue regarding

1 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 105