Supreme Court: Prior Meeting Not Mandate for Section 34 IPC, Common Intention Can Form During Offence

Prior Meeting of Minds Not a Mandate to Trigger Section 34 IPC, Common Intention Can Form Even During Commission of Offence: Supreme Court

The Division Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court comprising of Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Pankaj Mithal in the matter of Ram Naresh v. State of UP has clarified that to attract Section 34

Compulsorily Convertible Debentures Should Be Treated As Equity For The Purpose of IBC: Supreme Court

Compulsorily Convertible Debentures Should Be Treated As Equity For The Purpose of IBC: Supreme Court

The debatable issue that arises in corporate laws pertaining to compulsory convertible debentures (CCDs) is whether such CCDs fall under the ambit of financial debt under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) or not. A

If the Document Required to be Stamped is Insufficiently Stamped, then its Copy Cannot be Adduced as Secondary Evidence: Supreme Court

If the Document Required to be Stamped is Insufficiently Stamped, then its Copy Cannot be Adduced as Secondary Evidence: Supreme Court

The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) recently in the case of Vijay v. Union of India[1], held that if a document required to be stamped is not sufficiently stamped, then a copy of such a document

Specific Performance of Re-conveyance Deed Cannot be Entertained if Defendant's Title in Property is Denied by Plaintiff: Supreme Court

Specific Performance of Re-conveyance Deed Cannot be Entertained if Defendant’s Title in Property is Denied by Plaintiff: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in a recent judgment[1] denied the plea of the appellants (Madhavan through legal representative and Ors.) seeking specific performance for execution of the re-conveyance deed. The Court highlighted that from the plea

Our Partner Nidhi Singh Quoted in Business Standard

https://www.business-standard.com/finance/personal-finance/special-marriage-act-only-wife-entitled-to-permanent-alimony-maintenance-123120400914_1.html

Sections 95 to 100 of the IBC are Constitutional: Supreme Court

Sections 95 to 100 of the IBC are Constitutional: Supreme Court

A three-judge bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court (SC) comprising of Chief Justice of India Dr. DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Mishra, while considering a batch of 384 petitions moved under Article

1 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 97