No Contrary View Can Be taken by Labour Court Once Order of Termination approved by the Industrial Tribunal: Supreme Court

The Hon’ble Supreme Court recently held that the order passed by Industrial Tribunal.1 is binding. The views of Industrial Tribunal being higher forum attains finality and no contrary view can be taken by the Labour

L&T Realty v/s L&T Raintree Boulevard Welfare Association:

ALOTTEES NOT PERMITTED TO USE NAME OF PROJECT HAVING TRADEMARK OF PROMOTER         vs      On 11th October 2022, the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the matter of L&T Realty Developers

Margin Money is not included as Security Interest under the IBC and is not an asset of the Corporate Debtor: NCLAT Principal Bench

The Hon’ble Division Bench, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, (NCLAT) Principal Bench-New Delhi, comprising of Justice Anant Bijay Singh, Member (Judicial) and Ms. Shreesha Merla, Member (Technical) in Punjab National Bank v. Supriyo Kumar Chaudhari and Ors.1

Limitation period for filing applications under I&B Code

The Hon’ble Supreme Court, in Tech Sharp Engineers Private Limited v. Sanghvi Movers Limited (Civil Appeal No. 296 of 2020), on September 19, 2022, held “a claim may not be barred by limitation, it is

Resolution Plan that fails to address Statutory Dues is bound to be rejected by the Adjudicating Authority: Supreme Court

The Hon’ble Division Bench, Supreme Court comprising of Justice Indira Banerjee, and Justice A.S. Bopanna, in State Tax Officer (1) v. Rainbow Papers Limited (Civil Appeal No. 1664 of 2020), on 6th September, 2022, held that a

Shiju P Veetil, Senior Partner, Indialaw llp quoted in the economic times today