![](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Delhi-HC-S.124-applies-if-S.302e-defense-and-mark-invalidity-plea-raised-600x324.png)
Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 will be applicable only when a defence is raised under Section 30(2)(e) of the Act, followed by a plea of the invalidity of mark: Delhi High Court
The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi[1] (“HC”) recently dismissed an application moved by International Great Brands LLC, under section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“TM Act”) against Parle’s ‘FABIO’ mark.The HC dismissed the
![Supreme Court: Executing Court to Consider Questions Limited to Execution of Decree](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Supreme-Court-Executing-Court-to-Consider-Questions-Limited-to-Execution-of-Decree-600x324.png)
Supreme Court: Executing Court to Consider Questions Limited to Execution of Decree
In a recent decision[i], the Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC“)[ii], emphasized that the higher courts hold responsibility to rectify errors in order to ensure efficient administration of justice. The SC further clarified that according to section
![Unfold Nuances of Section 9 of Arbitration Act: A Case Study of Vivek Jain v. PrepLadder Pvt. Ltd., Delhi High Court](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Unfold-Nuances-of-Section-9-of-Arbitration-Act-A-Case-Study-of-Vivek-Jain-v.-PrepLadder-Pvt.-Ltd.-Delhi-High-Court--600x324.png)
Unfold Nuances of Section 9 of Arbitration Act: A Case Study of Vivek Jain v. PrepLadder Pvt. Ltd., Delhi High Court
It was interpreted by the Delhi High Court that the Court exercising its powers under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996(‘Arbitration Act’) to secure the amount in dispute or to order attachment
![IBBI Proposes Measures to Smoothen IBC Process for Real Estate Projects](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IBBI-Proposes-Measures-to-Smoothen-IBC-Process-for-Real-Estate-Projects-600x324.png)
IBBI Proposes Measures to Smoothen IBC Process for Real Estate Projects
In what appears to be a huge relief for homebuyers, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) in its Discussion Paper titled ‘Real-Estate Related Proposals- CIRP & Liquidation’ has proposed five measures to smoothen
![Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Insolvency Resolution Provisions Pertaining to Personal Guarantors](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/SC-Upholds-Validity-of-Insolvency-Provisions-for-Guarantors-600x324.png)
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Insolvency Resolution Provisions Pertaining to Personal Guarantors
The Supreme Court in Surendra B. Jiwrajika and Anr. vs. Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited[i] upheld the constitutionality of the provisions under Part-III, Chapter-III of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (I&B Code) pertaining to
![Sub-Registrar can't execute or register Cancellation Deed - Karnataka HC](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Sub-Registrar-cant-execute-or-register-Cancellation-Deed-Karnataka-HC-600x324.png)
Sub – Registrar cannot execute or register a Cancellation Deed as the same amounts to Recission of Contract – Karnataka High Court
In an important recent decision[i], the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court (“HC”) has laid down the law in relation to execution of cancellation deeds, holding that a Sub – Registrar cannot execute any deed by which
- Arbitration and Conciliation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy Code – Public Announcements
- Civil
- Commercial litigation
- Commercial/Corporate
- Competition act
- Criminal
- Cyber Law
- Debt Recovery
- Environment
- Family Law
- Food
- IL News
- Infrastructure
- Insolvency & Bankruptcy
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International
- Labour
- Law
- Medico-Legal
- Negotiable Instrument
- NRI Laws
- Policy
- Power
- Real Estate
- Tax