Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 will be applicable only when a defence is raised under Section 30(2)(e) of the Act, followed by a plea of the invalidity of mark: Delhi High Court

The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi[1] (“HC”) recently dismissed an application moved by International Great Brands LLC, under section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“TM Act”) against Parle’s ‘FABIO’ mark.The HC dismissed the

Supreme Court: Executing Court to Consider Questions Limited to Execution of Decree

Supreme Court: Executing Court to Consider Questions Limited to Execution of Decree

In a recent decision[i], the Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC“)[ii], emphasized that the higher courts hold responsibility to rectify errors in order to ensure efficient administration of justice. The SC further clarified that according to section

Unfold Nuances of Section 9 of Arbitration Act: A Case Study of Vivek Jain v. PrepLadder Pvt. Ltd., Delhi High Court 

Unfold Nuances of Section 9 of Arbitration Act: A Case Study of Vivek Jain v. PrepLadder Pvt. Ltd., Delhi High Court 

It was interpreted by the Delhi High Court that the Court exercising its powers under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996(‘Arbitration Act’) to secure the amount in dispute or to order attachment

IBBI Proposes Measures to Smoothen IBC Process for Real Estate Projects

IBBI Proposes Measures to Smoothen IBC Process for Real Estate Projects

In what appears to be a huge relief for homebuyers, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) in its Discussion Paper titled ‘Real-Estate Related Proposals- CIRP & Liquidation’ has proposed five measures to smoothen

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Insolvency Resolution Provisions Pertaining to Personal Guarantors

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Insolvency Resolution Provisions Pertaining to Personal Guarantors

The Supreme Court in Surendra B. Jiwrajika and Anr. vs. Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited[i] upheld the constitutionality of the provisions under Part-III, Chapter-III of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (I&B Code) pertaining to

Sub-Registrar can't execute or register Cancellation Deed - Karnataka HC

Sub – Registrar cannot execute or register a Cancellation Deed as the same amounts to Recission of Contract – Karnataka High Court

In an important recent decision[i], the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court (“HC”) has laid down the law in relation to execution of cancellation deeds, holding that a Sub – Registrar cannot execute any deed by which

1 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 115