ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL CAN NOT ORDER INTERIM DEPOSIT OF DISPUTED AMOUNT, WHERE THE LIABILITY IS IN DISPUTE: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna held, in a recent judgment1 Arbitral Tribunal (“Tribunal”) cannot pass an interim order under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the

SALARIES OF THOSE EMPLOYESS WHO WORKED DURING CIRP CONSTITUTE CIRP COSTS & PROVIDENT FUND, GRATUITY FUND TO BE KEPT OUT OF THE LIQUIDATION ESTATE

The Supreme Court bench comprising of Justices MR Shah and Aniruddha Bose in the recent Judgement1 held that: – the wages or salaries of only such workmen/employees, who worked during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

ARBITRAL AWARD IS NULL AND VOID IF PASSED PAST THE PRESCRIBED PERIOD: TELANGANA HC

The Telangana High Court comprising Justice P. Naveen Rao and Dr. Justice G. Radha Rani, in a recent Judgement1 held that the provisions of Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the “Act”),

An Arbitral Award can be set aside only when it is vitiated by patent illegality: SUPREME COURT

The Supreme Court, in a recent judgement1, delivered on 30th March 2022, noted that apart from the grounds mentioned in Section 34(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 2013 (the “Act”), an arbitral award can

An Adjudication is Final for Incidental or Connected Matters: Madras High Court

In the recent judgment1 the Honorable Justice Mr. N. Anand Venkatesh in the High Court of Madras held that an adjudication is final and conclusive not only to the matter adjudicated but also to matter

india law

NCLT CAN ISSUE NON BAILABLE WARRANT AGAINST PERSON UNDER IBC: NCLAT

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT”) in Vikram Puri vs Universal Builders1 held that the adjudicating authority has jurisdiction under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (“IBC”) to issue non-bailable warrant against persons. The decision was

1 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 115