Tag: Bombay High Court
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/622aa/622aa4d85ac2c0217e6ef995aa089e086f613009" alt="Bombay High Court Reiterates The Principle Of Exhausting Alternate Remedies"
Bombay High Court: Reiterates The Principle Of Exhausting Alternate Remedies
In a recent ruling[1], the Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“HC”) reiterated the long-standing legal principle that litigants must exhaust all available alternate remedies before invoking writ jurisdiction. The instant case in point involves M/s. Venus
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d823/5d823c8fd72ad0631e1a9e3dc4e29925b6dc989c" alt="BOMBAY HIGH COURT ISSUES JOHN DOE ORDER"
Bombay High Court Issues John Doe Order
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“HC”) in a recent judgment[i] has granted a temporary injunction to HDFC Life Insurance Co. Ltd. (“Applicant”) against an unidentified individual who allegedly attempted to extort money by threatening to
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0fa6/c0fa6736ed026915a7ee75df5535acc2e985a49f" alt="Bombay High Court Reiterates Rejection Of Plaint To Be Directed Due To Non-Compliance With Mandatory Mediation Procedure Under Section 12A Of The Commercial Courts Act, 2015"
Bombay High Court Reiterates: Rejection Of Plaint To Be Directed Due To Non-Compliance With Mandatory Mediation Procedure Under Section 12A Of The Commercial Courts Act, 2015
In a recent judgement[i], passed by the Ld. Single Judge of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“HC”) rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”). The HC
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cc70/4cc70b2090bb7311f096f9a668cac4564578b6fd" alt="Existence Of Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Indisputable In Proceedings Under The MRTU & PULP Act: Bombay HC"
Existence Of Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Indisputable In Proceedings Under The MRTU & PULP Act: Bombay HC
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“HC”) was recently seized with a writ petition[1] under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging an order of an Industrial Court holding its own jurisdiction as maintainable in
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1034/f1034b74b986f2f6e0fba71479db916bacb3b122" alt=""
Validity of non-compete clauses post termination of agreement- Bombay High Court
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“HC”) recently held, in a significant ruling[1] that although a non-compete clause may be valid throughout the duration of an agreement, post the termination of the agreement, such a clause
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffb6b/ffb6bb6d8a6321487209acb176d035fcdd48590a" alt="Bombay High Court Holds That Mediation Procedure In Commercial Suits Is Not Strictly Mandatory In Commercial IPR Suits"
Bombay High Court Holds That Mediation Procedure In Commercial Suits Is Not Strictly Mandatory In Commercial IPR Suits
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“HC”) has recently held, in a noteworthy judgment[i], that the mandatory provisions of section 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, are not required to be complied with in commercial suits
- Arbitration and Conciliation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy Code – Public Announcements
- Civil
- Commercial litigation
- Commercial/Corporate
- Competition act
- Criminal
- Cyber Law
- Debt Recovery
- Environment
- Family Law
- Food
- IL News
- Infrastructure
- Insolvency & Bankruptcy
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International
- Labour
- Law
- Medico-Legal
- Negotiable Instrument
- NRI Laws
- Policy
- Power
- Real Estate
- Tax