Tag: Bombay High Court
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50500/50500bb8a657f1a4746fc4b5857615296610f09a" alt="Bombay High Court Gives Nod to Tenants to Redevelop Demolished Building Themselves"
Bombay High Court Gives Nod to Tenants to Redevelop Demolished Building Themselves
The High Court of Bombay (“HC”) in a recent judgment[i] permitted the tenants to reconstruct their demolished premises u/s 499(6) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act (“MMC Act”). It further directed to recover costs from
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49a48/49a48d7c8471e39ea69923f6b91fd3506a48a481" alt="Court Can Determine Stamp Duty Payable Under The Unstamped Arbitration Agreement – Bombay High Court"
Court Can Determine Stamp Duty Payable Under The Unstamped Arbitration Agreement – Bombay High Court
Recently, in the case of John Cockerill India Ltd. vs. Sanjay Navare[1], the Hon’ble Bombay High Court held that the Court can determine the stamp duty payable under the unstamped Arbitration Agreement. The Court was
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aaae3/aaae380942b8b8c7052b18d1f9881efed007dc4b" alt="Anti–suit permanent injunction can limit legal options: Bombay HC"
Anti-suit permanent injunction may leave the party with no other option available in law: Hon’ble Bombay High Court
In a recent noteworthy decision, the Hon’ble Bombay High Court[i] has granted interim relief to Mr. Anupam Mittal, the founder of Shaadi.com, by staying an anti–suit permanent injunction order directed by the Hon’ble Singapore High
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b2bb/1b2bbe43f3732cf104648ad82a27794a43832e54" alt="Assignee can invoke arbitration clause Bombay High Court"
Assignee, having stepped into the shoes of the assignor, can invoke arbitration clause: Bombay High Court.
In a recent order,in the matter of M/s. Siemens Factoring Private Limited v. Future Enterprises Private Limited[1]the Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“the Court”) held that an assignee, though not a party but having stepped into
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7522c/7522c2b1f5f7d328b6da6181710497b995b86126" alt=""
L&T Realty v/s L&T Raintree Boulevard Welfare Association:
ALOTTEES NOT PERMITTED TO USE NAME OF PROJECT HAVING TRADEMARK OF PROMOTER vs On 11th October 2022, the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the matter of L&T Realty Developers
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61a4d/61a4d8c884d5962b612f903a93b93a3733b7e405" alt=""
Ravindra Babulal Jain and Anr. v State of Maharashtra and Anr.
By Pankhuri Malik & Varsha G Subramanian Introduction In the case of Ravindra Babulal Jain and Anr. v State of Maharashtra and Anr.[1] the Bombay High Court has held that fraudulently evading stamp duty may not
- Arbitration and Conciliation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy Code – Public Announcements
- Civil
- Commercial litigation
- Commercial/Corporate
- Competition act
- Criminal
- Cyber Law
- Debt Recovery
- Environment
- Family Law
- Food
- IL News
- Infrastructure
- Insolvency & Bankruptcy
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International
- Labour
- Law
- Medico-Legal
- Negotiable Instrument
- NRI Laws
- Policy
- Power
- Real Estate
- Tax