Tag: JJ
Limitations Of Defences In Transactions Affected By Lis Pendens: Supreme Court
The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) in its latest judgement[i] reiterated that once the transaction is affected by the doctrine of Lis Penden, then the defence of being a bona fide purchaser and lack of notice
Failure of the Defendant to file Written Statement Does Not Seize its Right to Cross-Examine: Supreme Court
The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) recently delivered a noteworthy judgment in the case of Ranjit Singh & Anr. v. State of Uttarakhand & Ors.[i], addressing significant concern over an ex parte proceeding and the striking
Third Parties Not Required to Seek Cancellation of Void Sale Deeds Under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act: Supreme Court
In a recent landmark decision, the Hon’ble Supreme Court[1] (“SC”) held that third parties affected by invalid sale deeds are not obligated to formally seek their cancellation. [1] Sk. Golam Lalchand v. Nandu Lal Shaw
Supreme Court Lays Down Principles On Amendment Of Plaint Under Order VI Rule 17 Of The Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908
In a recent judgment[i], the Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) reiterated the principles on amendment of a plaint as prescribed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908[ii] (“CPC”). A division bench
- Arbitration and Conciliation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy Code – Public Announcements
- Civil
- Commercial litigation
- Commercial/Corporate
- Criminal
- Cyber Law
- Debt Recovery
- Food
- IL News
- Infrastructure
- Insolvency & Bankruptcy
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International
- Labour
- Law
- Medico-Legal
- Negotiable Instrument
- NRI Laws
- Policy
- Power
- Real Estate
- Tax
