Tag: supreme court

Third Parties Not Required to Seek Cancellation of Void Sale Deeds Under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act Supreme Court

Third Parties Not Required to Seek Cancellation of Void Sale Deeds Under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act: Supreme Court

In a recent landmark decision, the Hon’ble Supreme Court[1] (“SC”) held that third parties affected by invalid sale deeds are not obligated to formally seek their cancellation. [1] Sk. Golam Lalchand v. Nandu Lal Shaw

SUPREME COURT LAYS DOWN PRINCIPLES ON AMENDMENT OF PLAINT UNDER ORDER VI RULE 17 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

Supreme Court Lays Down Principles On Amendment Of Plaint Under Order VI Rule 17 Of The Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908

In a recent judgment[i], the Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) reiterated the principles on amendment of a plaint as prescribed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908[ii] (“CPC”). A division bench

Landowners And Builder Jointly Liable Despite Revocation Of Power Of Attorney Supreme Court

Landowners And Builder Jointly Liable Despite Revocation Of Power Of Attorney: Supreme Court

The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) in the case of Akshay and Anr. v. Aditya and Ors.[i] dismissed the Civil Appeals filed in a real estate dispute. The bench comprising of Bela M. Trivedi and Satish

Appellate Courts Must Adhere To Order XLI And Cannot Create A New Case For Parties Supreme Court

Appellate Courts Must Adhere To Order XLI And Cannot Create A New Case For Parties: Supreme Court

In a recent landmark judgment[i], the Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) emphasized a crucial principle in appellate jurisprudence, stating that the appellate courts must strictly adhere to procedural norms and cannot create new issues or cases

Whether the restructuring process as contemplated in the Notification dated 29th May 2015 issued by the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) is directory or mandatory.

Whether the restructuring process as contemplated in the Notification dated 29th May 2015 issued by the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) is directory or mandatory.

Introduction The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in a recent landmark decision passed vide Order dated 01.08.2024 in the matter of Pro Knits v. Board of Directors of Canara Bank[i], addressed a crucial issue regarding

SC upholds filing written statement after 17 years delay

Supreme Court upholds Calcutta High Court decision permitting filing of written statement after 17 years due to error on part of the Registry

The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”)[i] has recently passed a judgment in the case of PIC Departmentals Pvt. Ltd. v. Sreeleathers Pvt. Ltd.[ii], arising out of the judgment[iii] of a Division Bench of the Hon’ble Calcutta

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10