Tag: supreme court
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6a0e/e6a0e7571c1a9e2ce121e4d3bcba238f91128dff" alt="Fundamental Right of the consumer to be made aware of the quality of products"
Supreme Court Recognizes The Fundamental Rights Of Consumers In Relation To Misleading Advertisements
In a significant development, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has passed an order on 7th May 2024, addressing the issue of misleading advertisements, particularly in the food and health sectors. The directions were passed
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7aaf4/7aaf4135e639051b0ea817303db491156336e329" alt="Service Provider Must Substantiate Any Claim That A Service Was Availed For Commercial Purposes Supreme Court"
Service Provider Must Substantiate Any Claim That A Service Was Availed For Commercial Purposes: Supreme Court
In a judgment passed by the Supreme Court, delivered by a Bench presided by the Hon’ble Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Aravind Kumar. The Hon’ble Bench dismissed appeals filed by Shriram Chits (India) Private
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1d3e/f1d3ea384db44f356f686ee0ad51600ee6945508" alt="Deceptively Similar Trademark Delhi High Court Grants Permanent Injunction To Karim’s"
Deceptively Similar Trademark: Delhi High Court Grants Permanent Injunction To Karim’s
The Bench of Hon’ble Delhi High Court, comprising of Hon’ble Justice Sanjeev Narula rendered a significant ruling, in favour of Karim Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (“Plaintiff Company”) in a trademark infringement Suit. The legal dispute revolved
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0cc1b/0cc1be1cc3ef0ffecfb3310ceb69a41bd5a96bbf" alt="Accountability Of Advocate’s Services Vis-A -Vis Liability Under Consumer Protection Act: Supreme Court"
Accountability Of Advocate’s Services Vis-A -Vis Liability Under Consumer Protection Act: Supreme Court
The Hon’ble Apex Court in the matter of Bar of Indian Lawyers Through its President Jasbir Sigh Malik vs D.K Gandhi PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases[1] overruled a 2007 judgement of the National Consumer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9cfe/e9cfe4cdd0b994f2fb7b04446c632f9462021125" alt="Preparing for the unexpected: Understanding the concept of Living Wills"
Preparing for the unexpected: Understanding the concept of Living Wills
An unfortunate or unexpected incident in life can come up at any time, this emphasizes the importance of a ‘Living Will’. A ‘Living Will’ in legal terms is known as an ‘Advance Medical Directive’ which
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1609/a160941f5502cadf909bc9eaab763984b8764df5" alt="Supreme Court Reiterates Duty of Care in Medical Negligence Case"
Supreme Court Reiterates Duty of Care in Medical Negligence Case
This judgementi concerns a medical negligence case where a 13-year-old boy, Master Irshad, lost vision in his right eye following a cataract surgery performed by the respondents. The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (“DCDRC”) initially
- Arbitration and Conciliation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy Code – Public Announcements
- Civil
- Commercial litigation
- Commercial/Corporate
- Competition act
- Criminal
- Cyber Law
- Debt Recovery
- Environment
- Family Law
- Food
- IL News
- Infrastructure
- Insolvency & Bankruptcy
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International
- Labour
- Law
- Medico-Legal
- Negotiable Instrument
- NRI Laws
- Policy
- Power
- Real Estate
- Tax